Rabbi Moshe Schick (1807-1879) was a major Hungarian halakhic authority during the second half of the 19th century. He was also a close pupil of the Chatam Sofer (Rav Moshe Sofer, Hungary, 1762-1839), with whom he studied in the Pressburg Yeshiva. In 1838, on his teacher’s recommendation, Rabbi Schick was appointed Rabbi of Yeregin (Northeast of Bratislava), where he opened his own yeshiva and remained for 23 years. In 1861, together with 800 of his students, he moved to the town of Huszt in western Ukraine, where he served until the end of his life. Commonly known as “Mahara”m” Schick, he published commentaries on the Talmud and the Torah. He is best known, however, for his responsa, which include more than a thousand teshuvot on all four volumes of the Shulchan Arukh.
The following teshuvah was written towards the end of the great cholera pandemic of 1863-1875. Mahara”m Schick was asked whether the Jewish community must fast and maintain mourning customs during Tisha B’Av even though they were still in the throes of the pandemic.
Mahara”m Schick first addresses fasting by noting that even a sick person who is not dangerously ill is not required to refrain from eating on Tisha B’Av. Furthermore, Magen Avraham (Rabbi Avraham Gombiner, Poland, 1635-1682) established that fasting weakens a person’s resistance to illness, and therefore one must be particularly careful at a time when illness is rampant. Because of this, Mahara”m Schick argues that even healthy people should be excused from fasting as long as the risk of cholera persists. He likens the air which (he thought) carries the illness to a scorpion’s sting and argues that, if fasting would make people more vulnerable to the “sting” of the air, they should make sure to eat even if they are not presently endangered by the disease. The potential danger is to be treated as actual danger, thereby allowing them to forgo halakhic obligations (at least those of rabbinic origin) that would make them more vulnerable to the disease. This, however, does not mean that one should eat indiscriminately on Tisha B’Av. One should only eat what one must to prevent herself or himself from becoming weak. What was true in the time of Mahara”m Schick remains true today. His halakhic reasoning remains relevant and should be given serious consideration given the current reality.
With regards to the mourning practices of Tisha B’Av, Mahara”m Schick asserts that these practices should be observed. He raises the possibility that one’s mood can impact one’s vulnerability to illness but ultimately concludes that the mourning of Tisha B’Av will not negatively affect one’s health in a significant way. The reason for this is that Tisha B’Av is not just about sadness and mourning, but it is also about hope. When a person whom we love dies, we cannot mourn forever. Halakha prescribes that the mourning must eventually come to an end. We find ourselves comforted and move on. Yet, the very fact that we continue to mourn the loss of the Temple so many years after its destruction indicates that we still have hope that God will rebuild the Temple and return our exiles. This is an important insight to remember this year on Tisha B’Av. As difficult as the COVID-19 pandemic has been, we have finally begun to see its end. So too we must remember the same applies to TIsha B’Av. Though the years of exile have been long and dark, hope still remains. In mourning we hold fast to God’s promise of redemption.
שו”ת מהר”ם שיק אורח חיים סימן רפטהנה הרמב”ן [תורת האדם שער אבלות ישנה] והרבה מהראשונים ודעתם הובאה בשולחן ערוך סימן תקנ”ד סעיף ו’ דחולה שאין בו סכנה וצריך לאכול – מאכילין אותו. ודעת הטורי זהב שם בס”ק ד’ דאיכא מקצת חשש סכנה. ומדברי הרב המגיד בפרק ה’ מתענית [הלכה י’] מוכח דלא בעי שום חשש סכנה, דהרי הוכיח כן מדאיצטרך לאשמעינן [פסחים נ”ד ע”ב] דמעוברות ומניקות מתענות, ואי בחולה בעיא סכנה – פשיטא דעוברות ומיניקות מתענות, ועל כרחך דאפילו באין בו חשש סכנה אין חולה מתענה, דבמקום חולי לא גזרו רבנן. וכתב בביאורי הגר”א ווילנא זצ”ל [סימן תקנ”ד שם] ראיה מהא דהתירו לחיה נעילת סנדל וסיכה לחולה ביום הכפורים [שו”ע או”ח סימן תרי”ד סעיף ג’] משום דהם רק דרבנן, ואם כן תשעה באב דכולו דרבנן הכי נמי דבמקום חולי לא גזרו. ואם כן הכא נמי וכל שכן הוא בנידון שלנו שהרי כתב המגן אברהם בסימן תקע”ו ס”ק ב’ דבזמן הזה אין מתענין כלל בשעת הדבר, דדבר ידוע דאליבא ריקניא קולט האויר החולה, עיין שם. ובסימן תרי”ד [סעיף ד’] איתא דמשום חשש נשיכת עקרב וכיוצא מותר לנעול. ואם כן הכא נמי משום חשש נשיכת אויר החולה הותרה איסור דרבנן. מיהו בוודאי אינו מותר רק מידי דצריך, דנהי דהרמב”ן הנ”ל כתב דאין צריך אומד, מכל מקום הרי גם בעוברות בג’ צומות כתב דהותר רק כדי קיום הוולד. וכן מבואר בדברי מרן הגאון בעל חתם סופר בחלק אורח חיים סימן קנ”ז דאי סגי ליה בטעימה או בשתיה מועטת אסור לו לאכול יותר, ועיין שם דאי סגי ליה בפחות משתיית רביעית ובפחות מאכילת כזית ולשהות בנתיים כדי אכילת פרס אסור לו לאכול יותר. ודברי הרמב”ן והשולחן ערוך היינו היכא דמספקא ליה אי סגי ליה, מותר לאכול ולשתות ואין צריך אומד, אבל יותר מכדי צרכו לא. והעיקר בדברים אלו יש לשאול ברופאים ולעשות כדבריהם כמבואר בלשון מרן זצ”ל בחתם סופר חלק ו’ בסימן כ”ג. וכל זה לענין התענית, אבל שאלה השניה לענין אבילות, בוודאי שאר ענינים רחיצה וסיכה ונעילת הסנדל וכל איסור מלאכה ודיני אבלות דינו כתשעה באב. וראיתי בבאר היטב באורח חיים סימן תקע”ו [ס”ק ב’] שכתב שאין להתאבל משום שינוי האויר. וזה לא נמצא בשום מקום, אלא ביורה דעה סוף סימן שע”ד [סעיף י”א] איתא דמשום בעיתותא אין מתאבלין. ומעלתו נ”י כתב דאיכא למימר דזה רק על מי שמת בדבר. ובאמת גם לי היה נראה כן, אבל מלשון רמ”א ושאר אחרונים שכתבו שאין מתאבלים ‘בשעת הדבר’ לא משמע כן, וספר תשובת מהרי”ל אין בידי. ונראה כוונתו כמו שכתב הרמב”ן בחומש בפרשת וירא [בראשית י”ט י”ז] שהראות באויר הדבר ובכל החליים הנדבקים יזיק מאוד וידביקם וכן המחשבה בהם, עיין שם. וכל שכן הביעתותא מהם, ואפילו ביעותותא ומיתה אחרת בזמן הדבר, מוליד המחשבה בהם ומזיק. אבל אבילות על חורבן ירושלים אין לה המשך למיתה, אדרבה ‘שישו אתה משוש כל המתאבלים’ [ישעיהו ס”ו י’], והמתאבל עליה זוכה ורואה בשמחתה [תענית ל’ ע”ב], ופירש הבינה לעתים [דרוש נ”א] שהאבל מעורר אותנו שיש עוד תקוה ואין מקבלין תנחומין על החי ושעוד ידו נטויה עלינו ויבוא דודי לגנו, וזה עצמו ראוי להיות מצילו מן הדבר מה’ יתברך… | The opinion of the Ramban…and many other early authorities are brought in Shulchan Arukh…that a sick person whose life is not in danger but needs to eat is permitted to do so during a fast. The Turei Zahav (Rav David HaLevi Segal, Poland, 1586-1667) explains that this ruling applies when there is at least some small concern for life-threatening danger. But the Magid Mishna (Rav Vidal de Toulouse, Spain, 14th c.)…proves that this applies even when there is no concern for life-threatening danger at all. For in the Talmud it states that a pregnant woman and a nursing mother should fast (on Tisha B’Av). If we were to only excuse sick people from fasting in situations where there is life-threatening danger, it would be obvious that a pregnant woman or a nursing mother (who are not in any danger) must fast! Rather, it must be the case that even if there is no concern of danger, a sick person is not required to fast. For the rabbis did not decree fasts in cases of sickness. The Beurei Ha-GR”A (Rabbi Eliyahu of Vilna, 1720-1797) as well writes that the proof is that leather shoes are permitted for a midwife and that a sick person may be annointed on Yom Kippur…because they are only rabbinic prohibitions. If this is so, on Tisha B’Av, which is entirely rabbinic, the rabbis did not decree (fasting for the sick). Therefore, this is all the more true in our case! For the Magen Avraham writes…that in our time, we do not fast at all during a plague, because it is well known that going without food makes one more vulnerable to the pestilential air. And he writes (elsewhere), we are permitted to wear leather shoes if we are concerned that we will be stung by a scorpion. Therefore, in our case too, out of concern for the “sting” of the pestilential air, the rabbinic prohibitions [of Tisha B’Av] are permitted.
However, we certainly only permit what one requires. For even if the Ramban wrote that we don’t need to ascertain the opinion of doctors, in any case, even pregnant women should only eat as much as is necessary to keep the fetus alive on minor fast days. And this is explicit in the words of our teacher, the genius, the Chatam Sofer…that if they are satisfied with just a taste or a small drink; it is forbidden for them to eat more. And also note that if it is sufficient for them to drink less than a revi’it (approx. half a cup) and eat less than an olive’s volume and wait between bites longer than it takes to eat a small loaf, it is forbidden for them to eat more. The leniency of the Ramban and the Shulchan Arukh apply when we are in doubt if this small amount is sufficient. In that case, they may eat more without having to get a doctor’s opinion. But they may never eat more than they need. The key in these matters is to ask the doctors and follow their instructions as our teacher, the Chatam Sofer explains…
All of this is in relation to the fast. But regarding the second question, about mourning, certainly the other prohibitions of washing, anointing, wearing leather shoes, and working are in effect. The laws of mourning are like the laws of Tisha B’Av. And I saw that the Be’er Heitev (Rav Yehuda Ashkenazi, Poland, d.1743)…writes that we shouldn’t mourn because of the change in the air. And this has no source. Rather, it says (in the Shulchan Arukh) that (in certain cases) one doesn’t mourn because of fear. And your honor wrote that this must be specifically about somebody who dies of the plague and indeed, this is what I thought as well. However, this doesn’t seem to be the case according to the language of the Rama (Rav Moshe Iserles, Krakow, 1530-1572) and the other late authorities, who wrote that we don’t mourn at the time of the plague. It appears that the intention (of the Be’er Heitev) is like what the Ramban wrote on Parshat VaYera that looking at the air of a plague or any other contagious disease is very harmful and can transmit it to them. The same is true for thinking about such diseases. And this is all the more so true of the fear of them brought about in a time of plague. Even fear of death from other causes at the time of plague, can lead to these thoughts and do damage. However, mourning for the temple is not a continuation of death. On the contrary, “Join in her jubilation, All you who mourned over her” (Isaiah 66:10), and the one who mourns for her “merits to see her joy” (Ta’anit 30b). The Binah Le’Itim (Rav Azariah Piccio, Venice, 1579-1647) explains that mourning awakens in us the feeling that there is still hope, for we do not receive comfort for the living, and that God’s hand is still stretched out to us, and “Let my beloved come to his garden” (Song of Songs 4:16), and this itself is enough to save us from the plague… |
שו”ת
All of the content in The Lindenbaum Center for Halakhic Studies is released with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. It is open for reuse with the following attribution: "Authored by [name of author] from The Lindenbaum Center for Halakhic Studies at YCT.